Why do cable companies have to pay for networks such as ABC, NBC, and Fox when they still contain commercials? - how to distribute a free magazine
If the networks do not want cable companies to distribute their programming so that advertising can be seen by many customers as possible? If ads pay for the production of programming? It seems a double standard that some of these channels can receive free to air, while others indirectly for your cable channels, pay as needed. I understand the need for channels like HBO and Showtime are no ads have to be paid, but why are the channels that have advertising?
Sunday, January 10, 2010
How To Distribute A Free Magazine Why Do Cable Companies Have To Pay For Networks Such As ABC, NBC, And Fox When They Still Contain Commercials?
1 comment:
I think it was a step most damaging type for Time Warner Cable, which intimidation Fox. On 1 TW January finally gave in and agreed to pay $ 1/customer Fox Fox air, which then charged to the customer. Fox was a date of 1 January got nervous, because until then had not accepted qualifications and TW fears such as American Idol was down sharply from next week and then start disappearing billions in revenue from the ads. Instead, TW and now sells the CBS contract expires in the next few weeks and they want to have money like all the other channels. The only solution I see is that people send a message by canceling your cable. I mean, you see the online programs in any way. Why are the pockets of big corporations even more. If Simon Cowell can be paid 70 thousand a year, so I'm sure you do not need a dollar for every viewer.
Post a Comment